No. 20-558

Jon D. Adams v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 26-usc-6404e case-law fifth-circuit interest-abatement judicial-review lee-v-commissioner statutory-interpretation tax-abatement tax-law tax-procedure
Key Terms:
ERISA
Latest Conference: 2020-11-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Taxpayer was entitled to interest abatement under 26 U.S.C.A. § 6404(e)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented for review by the Supreme Court of the United States of America is whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Taxpayer was not entitled to interest abatement under 26 U.S.C.A. § 6404(e) when it relied on Lee v. Commissioner, which has been distinguished by more recent case law. -ji STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND PROCEEDINGS The Appellant, Jon D. Adams, respectfully avers that the caption of the case contains the names of all the parties whose judgment is sought to be reviewed. Therefore, under Rule 14(1)(b)G) of the Supreme Court Rules, a list of all parties is not necessary. Furthermore, a

Docket Entries

2020-11-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-11-02
Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed.
2020-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jon Adams
James Gary McGeeMcGee Tax Law, PLLC, Petitioner