Whether the failure of counsel to seek a Batson hearing to present evidence of a pattern of discrimination in jury selection, and the failure to present favorable evidence found by the inmate without counsel's knowledge, violates the petitioner's right to due process and equal protection under the 5th and 14th Amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WWOVIE Torors C ; € Traumatic bean ise Gonsiched me ( eudence of 4 OIL BUN the atk User an a Presented 7 sDoed not the Gi lure ; ' of CounSe/ to Seek 2 B Predent evidences found by inmute without wae OP 710 Favorable to defence PrOVe CounSel’s incbhect <, ards 4p, Violates petitioner's Cigit to due pn, WE NEEE Gnel al Mghts Coveted by the 5th a foes peor tera) and . id 7 & lym amendments 7 » Dved ber Plated rr dur . eS b 17 Crimed ne Niatent 2 of Mec kecs Cond hale + Being Pind Ponges by tral Coot & StenograPhel Fo Sranscenpts js « violaton of my due Proce3§ at Ane agPelate leve| maht? . Finding OVX a Joror wad hegcing 1M Paired at the ong Ad tol Court it 1 , coe Proceed with dehberaton? «Lon YS Gort vncovel +he efrorS at trial & evidence Superead by The trial Court So that Competent APS Go Pender a faim verde? ane Oe