No. 20-5584
David Matthews v. United States
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act borden-v-united-states criminal-offense mens-rea recklessness statutory-interpretation violent-felony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness can qualify as a 'violent felony' under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED L Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness can qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). i
Docket Entries
2021-07-23
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-06-21
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Borden</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 593 U. S. ___ (2021).
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-04
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-10-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 4, 2020.
2020-10-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 4, 2020 to December 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 4, 2020.
2020-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 5, 2020 to November 4, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2020)
Attorneys
David Matthews
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent