When considering guidelines rulings, should appellate courts review the decision to depart from the guideline range in the same way as other guidelines decisions as eight circuits have held, or should the review of sentencing departures be folded into substantive reasonableness review as the Ninth Circuit found below?

Question Presented When considering guidelines rulings, should appellate courts review the decision to depart from the guideline range in the same way as other guidelines decisions as eight circuits have held, or should the review of sentencing departures be folded into substantive reasonableness review as the Ninth Circuit found below?