No. 20-5595
Joshua Glen Box v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-circuit categorical-approach child-pornography criminal-law eighth-circuit federal-criminal-law predicate-offense predicate-offenses sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit erred when it failed to properly apply the categorical approach to determine whether Mr. Box's prior Arkansas convictions for possession of child pornography qualified as predicate offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit erred when it failed to properly apply the categorical approach to determine whether Mr. Box’s prior Arkansas convictions for possession of child pornography qualified as predicate offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)? ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Joshua Box
Anna Marie Williams — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Anna Marie Williams — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent