No. 20-5603
Michael A. Glover v. Pennsylvania
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment amendment-violation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence-sufficiency reasonable-doubt sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Pennsylvania state courts violate the petitioner's 5th and 14th amendment rights when they found the petitioner guilty despite insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | . I. DID THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE COURTS VIOLATE THE PETITIONER'S: oe | 5TH & 14TH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHEN THEY FOUND THE PETITIONER GUILTY OF NUMEROUS CHARGES IN WHICH . THE EVIDENCE WAS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE THE PETITIONER GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. w : Oe
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2020-08-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2020)
Attorneys
Pennsylvania
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent