No. 20-561
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Appellants v. City of San Jose, California, et al.
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2021-01-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2020-12-28
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See <i>Trump</i> v. <i>New York</i>, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (<i>per curiam</i>). Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan, dissents for the reasons stated in <i>Trump</i> v. <i>New York</i>, 592 U. S. ___ (2020) (Breyer, J., dissenting).
2020-12-07
Reply of appellants Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Motion to dismiss or affirm filed by appellees State of California, et al. (Distributed)
2020-11-25
Motion to affirm filed by appellees City of San Jose, California, et al.
2020-11-24
Motion For Expedited consideration of the Jurisdictional Statement and Waiver of The 14-day Waiting period for Distribution filed by appellant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
2020-11-09
Letter of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. submitted.
2020-10-29
Statement as to jurisdiction filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
Attorneys
City of San Jose, California, et al.
Richard P. Bress — Latham & Watkins LLP, Respondent
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Petitioner
State of California
Aimee Athena Feinberg — California Department of Justice, Respondent