Whether the trial court interfered with the petitioner's state and federal constitutional rights to a fair jury trial by refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227 (1954), where there was extraneous contact with a deliberating juror, and where the court, based on an inadequate record, erroneously determined the circumstances of the contact, the impact on the juror, the prejudicial effect on the defendant, and did not permit all interested parties to participate

QUESTTONS PRESENTED +. BED PRE PRIAL COURT FNTERFERE WETH PETITIONRESS STAT AND PEDERAL CORSPTOUTIORAT RTGHTS TO A PATH duRy TRIAL BREN SHE REEUSED (O HOLD aN GVIDENTTACY HEARING PERSUANT THES COURT'S RULING TN REMMER © 5 UNEPER SAVES, 247 U.S. 227 (1954), WHERE TRERE WAS EY? RANEOUS COMEBCT UTTH & DELYSERATING JUROR, AND WHERE THE CODE, BASED WEON AN TNADEQUATE RECORD, HRROWECUSLY DFTERMTNED CHE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CONTACT, TRE TMPACT OF TEE EXORANEQUS CONTACT UPON THE 20NOR, THE PREGUDICTAT, EFFECT OF THE CONTACT UPON THE DEPENDANT, AND BLE INTERESPRD PARTIES WERE NOT PERMTPTED TO PARYTCIPATE? iid