No. 20-562
John Yearwood, et al. v. Department of the Interior, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure-act appellate-procedure constitutional-claims district-court forney-v-apfel judicial-review national-importance res-judicata standing standing-to-appeal
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the decision below denying the Petitioners' standing to appeal the district court's final judgment on their constitutional claims under the Administrative Procedure Act is in direct conflict with this Court's decision in Forney v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 266 (1998), as well as decisions of four other courts of appeals
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the decision below denying the Petitioners’ standing to appeal the district court’s final judgment on their constitutional claims under the Administrative Procedure Act is in direct conflict with this Court’s decision in Forney v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 266 (1998), as well as decisions of four other courts of appeals.
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-30
Waiver of right of respondents Department of Interior, et al. to respond filed.
2020-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Center for Biological Diversity, et al.
Jason Craig Rylander — Defenders of Wildlife, Respondent
Jason Craig Rylander — Defenders of Wildlife, Respondent
Department of Interior, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
John Yearwood, et al.
Chance Dean Weldon — Texas Public Policy Foundation, Petitioner
Chance Dean Weldon — Texas Public Policy Foundation, Petitioner