Environmental AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Securities
Where New Mexico's anti-waiver statute violates double jeopardy
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . | Where New Mexico Aas a clouble % anffwotver satute Shale t seg? felt Ipoh clalanclont hooky ¥y inet sate ks ight e pepe a ke, 2. Zs Tre decision by she New Nexto Disfprict Court Comtropy to New Nexices feciston Statede arch fle fedepol Cour rulings regardtho Clouble Jeopardy i Valentine v. kenteh arc! ted Stately. Blac? Ard ts Aas due fo dh tanreasom ble Disgtion of the New Mexfi0%S Sepreme Curt paling fA State Vv. Zéenfe§ 3, When @ state has an ant?-weiver stekule for oleable Jeepordys cane State Gut hold a le Pe ncornt i a yen Sp cement, cobere Phectefzacort i ‘S Gms, el S75 her g. S ALS LE fe. hn avcly ob IGT. opphes Soy Ges ale cetuar Botute! JeP Y, Con a clefendant hrocwwingly , Volurtorilly, inte ligenthy plead I> charges Tha r epee Atty jn dedteGparcy , since cloce? coy erede! tal rcade fhe delenda nt old not hive adequate nohice of Hie chases ? . 5. Did fle New Mexito Coot of & correctty snter pret are! oly Linkleol States % Bexe where Badong “eoce held 2 Vet cthend Yore fs Stafedte frohibiksp Waiver & peghe Nights, Those rights cannot becuaiveo! by anfi/hing a défendant sard at a plea heartagh 6. Con a Slede Court held a alefendent! 4 a pk reemeast Claiming Ho de~ Ferd ioatred all hs nplts, even He shdkille he aiigecly Udodecl ced Nef exist at fle firme oh aheged ervrme ? (ie. Con a cle + Knoaing ly, iateliigenty , ond! vekertoriley Plea! 2 0n Meal Serfence?), 22 Counsel ineffective fehen he accep hy allows @ clefenclont te be laced in le§ ; lows him e WHRAS: iat har ae ae a alaged ees 8. Lo Geensel inefective £ hefatls 4 investigate that moy lead 4o 2 volt Kesth Anendment Violation claim end Seypressin of evtdence ahere She evitlence Sth napthece ibfiputied Bontelp hope cole eel ich Mi ve Aishingu ideaht c eth ond enabl ~ ont Cor ece alfbts ? i LP 4. Qoes fle United Slates Gonstfation allow less protect’ ender fe Bill ob Aiphis pertotaing fo che process and eable jeopardy when establishing facts circums tances FF fhe alleged victim Ba AL Or, clases Ha Consfifution reguire te ne dajree ct protect Br fo dlefendonts regardfess ot to ge of fhe al&ged Vichm.