No. 20-5628

Javier Corona-Verduzco v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: based on the plain text of the statute without relying on extratextual sources of author 21-usc-841 drug-felony extratextual-sources first-step-act imprisonment-term plain-text plain-text-analysis plain-text-interpretation sentencing-enhancement serious-drug-felony statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the phrase 'served a term of imprisonment of more than 12 months' in the First Step Act unambiguously allows a defendant to sustain two 'serious drug felony' convictions simultaneously, based on the plain text of the statute, without relying on extratextual sources of authority?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The First Step Act of 2018 amended the statutory requirements for enhancing a defendant’s sentence after a drug conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841. Prior to receiving an enhanced sentence, a defendant must now have a “serious drug felony” conviction where “the offender served a term of imprisonment of more than 12 months.” The question presented is: Whether the phrase “served a term of imprisonment of more than 12 months” in the First Step Act unambiguously allows a defendant to sustain two “serious drug felony” convictions simultaneously, based on the plain text of the statute, without relying on extratextual sources of authority? i

Docket Entries

2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 9, 2020)

Attorneys

Javier Corona-Verduzco
Dan GoldbergFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Dan GoldbergFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent