Whether the petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel due to counsel's failure to investigate and present exculpatory evidence

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Ln Sy re Case babi frresP29 Edin Vasey rartes Suthual Delect Chinen whiire he. ans obuied Corplade asrvhrna of tounsel Thes case arate fom barker lbun I. eras whine oh hme lra¢ arverke on a hose Bluotoavnt; andl Druas es ubsesteantl ¥ found in he bole. Howerns ba al ne Lan Amn & pra avrest m Lbman bun tY .Tavas and Ja Charan ot ren Yh ore. Comurited Peniary Ay ord te intlaenee Ua Grand Tir Y. but oS Lee barkor Coun ty , Texas tld Pe bids tie prio ia Yh Llaman bunt> i Pevass Cave, He Aral hw Yor ure Could pot have krwwn of Via Periuvect Ste mart Iokhrran waived Yao esut tot tral Cumncel m Clemer Coen fy, Fras and boumeel Vharetoas also nitlerhre thich tel Ua pebhrut race tse. both tha ti Junllae, and Arial jute basieall4 veorthad he Aral Coumsel whith bol Pettimuh onto inh throluntw4 plea & avord withkon verdrets Aber ont of “ueoluntw plea “ pohtions aeguived witenee of Ya poriured ; Shhinwd fom Ye Char-ang oPoeor p baman Bourl¥ 1, TAKAL and vampHl4 Filed te“ Phate" lvls of Mebeas lepuy ir both boontys ee SAle mort Louldl i take Both lonvittms and Yea clbenhive. Pole. Blut bond thir ball belied en oY Farkor bseumT4 VHbvar al foould Shows Sterctral Detect Shure ~ bowever lleman buml4, Texas c/o La Lins to th “CCH and asa retult "COA" denied bbe brlGr Oan?4 -Tovasy App liratinn whieh this nacht pottin Concins. ho | eg hrevonbeol 5 tihuha COA of Trear onaneouslF ne Lt Im Mr toRW210 ~01 bY nf addverrma Ya. Chmar , (eale 4yp! Latin bole Sor ty brah (to. LRk_ Pravkor Chen fy s Core to yp 9+ 2/lo of Shoe Aon, 1 Addl 4 CET ~0124 01) 00 Ma Shrchial Eno totin-Seckuel Gro “ sceuvea! y ho ZL Y; oe ne b= 44,203" ry ec at Hais moment) y Cose ro 29153 is i!