No. 20-565
George Matthews, et ux. v. Andrew J. Becker, et al.
Tags: attorney-fees civil-procedure contempt-of-court court-orders eleventh-circuit judicial-accountability legal-procedure northern-district-court orders sanctions
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court failed to hold Attorneys in contempt of court after evidence was shown they violated orders from the Northern District Court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented 1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court failed to hold Attorneys in contempt of court after evidence was shown they violated orders from the Northern District Court 2. Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court failed to hold other courts accountable for entering judgments against . Petitioners for a claim for attorney fees that was previously adjudicated before the Northern District Court 1
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Motion of respondents for damages and costs pursuant to Rule 42.2 DENIED.
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-02-01
Reply of petitioners George Matthews, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-01
Response to motion for damages from petitioners George Matthews, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-11
Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari until February 3, 2021 granted.
2020-12-05
Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the case under Rule 15.5 from December 16, 2020 to February 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-30
Brief of respondents Andrew J. Becker, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-11-30
Motion of respondents for damages and costs pursuant to Rule 42.2 filed.
2020-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Andrew J. Becker
David Jason Merbaum — Merbaum & Becker, P.C., Respondent
David Jason Merbaum — Merbaum & Becker, P.C., Respondent