No. 20-5653
Hermenegildo Margarito Espinoza Espinoza v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process indictment jury-trial prior-conviction sentencing statutory-maximum
Key Terms:
Immigration Privacy
Immigration Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether all facts—including the fact of a prior conviction—that increase a defendant’s statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and either admitted by the defendant or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt? il
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Hermenegildo Espinoza
Amy R Blalock — Blalock Law Firm, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent