No. 20-5654
Aaron Jose Acuna-Duenas v. United States
Tags: due-process illegal-reentry immigration-court-jurisdiction immigration-law judicial-jurisdiction pereira-precedent pereira-v-sessions removal-orders separation-of-powers
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the immigration court lacked jurisdiction to issue orders of removal, violating separation-of-powers and due-process
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, in light of Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), the immigration court issuing orders of removal against each petitioner lacked jurisdiction to issue such orders, so that use of such orders in a prosecution for illegal reentry violated the separation of powers and due process. 1
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-31
Attorneys
Aaron Acuna-Duenas, et al.
Kathryn Shephard — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kathryn Shephard — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent