No. 20-5655
Casye Necole Richardson v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process judicial-discretion sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-review standard-of-review substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment
FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether substantive reasonableness review necessarily encompasses some degree of reweighing the sentencing factors? ii PARTIES Do Casye Necole Richardson is the petitioner, who was the defendantappellant below. The United States of America is the respondent, and was the plaintiff-appellee below. iii
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Casye Necole Richardson
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent