No. 20-5657
Eric Bernard Scott v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-review civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process judicial-discretion jurisdiction legal-review mandamus procedural-error standing
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals abused its discretion
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lL. WuerHe THE Uncerep Srares COURT OF APPEALS ABUSED -<C-TS DESCRETION BY FALLING 70 RULE ont APPeLLaaers APPEAL WHteH WAS RemmniDED bY Hts Court. © , Qner HER THE Dritren Sates COURT AF APPEARS AUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DENIYLtn/G THE meniOAmus PETLTLon AS FIEVOLOUS » | 2. Werner tHe Unreren Sutes Court AF APPEALS ADUSED L5 Drseretton By FATLINGTO HOLDS A HEARING Ont APPELL¥aHTS manOAmUS CueZm. 4. Wetter. He Unteen Soar E< Chul OF PERS POUSED 226 D2SChettan! BY DENYZWE ELLIANT Lowe wD PROCEED -<NFoRMA PAUPERLS.« _
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)