Whether the Third Circuit's approach to determining that New Jersey's second-degree robbery statute is divisible is contrary to Mathis v. United States

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Third Circuit’s approach, in United States v. McCants, 952 F.3d 416 (3d Cir. 2020), to determining that New Jersey’s seconddegree robbery statute is divisible, is contrary to Mathis v. United States when it ignores state law sources and relies on the layout of the statute and the fact that different subsections require different proof? i