Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED QUESTION # 1. Did the fact that a response from the Respondent was 0 not required in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims a cause the court to assume the Petitioner's “Extraordinary Writ" for relief was filed in retaliation for an adverse decision by the Respondent for Veterans benefits? QUESTION # 2. : Did erroneous ex parte communication between the Respondent and the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims _ cause the court to view the "Extraordinary Writ" as "...the Court construes as a request for a writ of mandamus..." ? QUESTION # 3. ; Is it appropriate or even legal for the Federal Circuit Court to ignore obvious Civil and Constitutional rights violations by the Respondent simply to shield the lower court from embarrassment?