No. 20-5660
Percy St. George v. Kevin Ransom, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-claim court-of-appeals district-court due-process habeas-corpus legal-standard petition-review reasonable-jurist standard-of-review standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable jurist could debate the third circuit court of appeals adoption that the district court's ruling that appellant's petition does not state a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW { ] For cases from federal courts: , A The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent Kevin Ransom, et al. to respond filed.
2020-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
Kevin Ransom, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent