Whether federal law renders the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in legal error, where the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania committed legal error by failing to grant review to adjudge the substantive nature and retroactive applicability of its holding in Commonwealth vs. Muniz

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Petitioner, has been incarcerated since 2014. Petitioner is serving a Sentence for a Violation of the Registration Requirements of the Pennsylvania Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act, also known as (S.O.R.N.A) (Subchapter H). Whether, Federal Law Renders the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Legal Error, where the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Committed Legal Error by failing to grant review to adjudge the Substantive Nature and Retroactive Applicability of it’s holding in Commonwealth vs. Muniz; 164 A.3d 1189 Pa. 2017—(Cert Denied Pennsylvania vs. Muniz; 925 S.Ct (2018), for the purposes of adopting the language set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Montgomery vs. Louisiana; 136 S.Ct 718; 193 L. Ed. 2d 599 (2016), regarding Substantive Rules of Constitutional Law and the Retroactive Effect they have in a Criminal Proceeding, to allow the Petitioner’s Untimely P.C.R.A succeed as a Timely Petition pursuant to the Jurisdictional Timeliness Exceptions to the Pennsylvania PostConviction Relief Act Time-Bar Exception set forth at & (2)? PARTIES OF THE PROCEEDING The