No. 20-5665

Nathaniel Marcus Gann v. Kathleen Allison, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-admissibility habeas-corpus testimonial-statements
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence a due process violation?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) | IS THE ADMISSION OF IRRELEVANT OR OVERTLY PREJUDICIAL | EVIDENCE A DUE PROCESS VIOLATION? , (AND IS SUCH A VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF HABEAS’ CORPUS?) 2) IS°A MIXTURE OF UNCROSS-EXAMINED TRSTIMONIAL STATEMENTS OFFERED FOR TRUTH AND NON-TESTIMONIAL HRARSAY PROHIBITED BY THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE? , . (AND IS SUCH A’ VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO ISSUR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS?) . 3) pors A CONVICTION FOR A CRIME THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT CHARGED WITH NOR ARRAINED FOR CONSTITUTE A DUF PROCESS VIOLATION? ; : (AND IS SUCH A VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF , HABEAS CORPUS?) .

Docket Entries

2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Nathaniel Gann
Nathaniel Marcus Gann — Petitioner
Nathaniel Marcus Gann — Petitioner