1) IS THE ADMISSION OF IRRELEVANT OR OVERTLY PREJUDICIAL
EVIDENCE A DUE PROCESS VIOLATION?
(AND IS SUCH A VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
HABEAS' CORPUS?)

2) IS A MIXTURE OF UNCROSS-EXAMINED TESTIMONIAL STATEMENTS
OFFERED FOR TRUTH AND NON-TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY PROHIBITED
BY THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE?
(AND IS SUCH A VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS?)

3) DOES A CONVICTION FOR A CRIME THE DEFENDANT WAS NOT
CHARGED WITH NOR ARRAINED FOR CONSTITUTE A DUE PROCESS
VIOLATION?
(AND IS SUCH A VIOLATION SUFFICIENT TO ISSUE A WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS?)

Is the admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence a due process violation?