No. 20-5675

Robert Trevino v. E. Dotson, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas intentional-oversight judicial-procedure legal-interpretation procedural-rules standing supreme-court
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-11-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the 14th Circuit depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory power?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the 14h Cincurt depart from the accepted and vswal tounse of judictal proceedings as to call for an exegcise of the Supreme Counts Supe Rvisonry power® . , Did the 4th Cincwt ortentionally overlook rhs own precedent that 1s in agreement with other circuit courts 6 9n “Ross Vv. Blake ” where such holding was upheld by the Supreme Court © | ; | Did the evidence pecend reflect-that an evidentiany heaaing was necessary to Resolve disputed SLacts that were interrelated to the exhaustion issuec t

Docket Entries

2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-07
Waiver of right of respondent Dotson, Ambriz, Vega, Anguiano, Collier, Elias, Milenewicz, Perez, Lord, Waterman, Sevier, Hopkins, and Medina to respond filed.
2020-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)

Attorneys

Dotson, Ambriz, Vega, Anguiano, Collier, Elias, Milenewicz, Perez, Lord, Waterman, Sevier, Hopkins, and Medina
Michelle Devorah IgraCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent
Michelle Devorah IgraCalifornia Department of Justice - Office of the A, Respondent
Robert Trevino
Robert Trevino — Petitioner
Robert Trevino — Petitioner