Did the lower courts fail to properly review the appellant's complaint and detect federal jurisdictional law violations?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED IN OBSERVANCE OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, TO LIVE WITH MASLOW’S FIVE HIERARCHY NEEDS AND THE PROTECTION, AS WELL AS, THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL APPLICABLE LAWS GRANTED TO ANY FREE CITIZEN OF THE U.S.A., TO UTILIZE WITH AUTHORITY THESE LAWS TO CEASE AND PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW WITH EXISTING SYSTEMATIC OPPRESSION IN THE LIFE OF THE APPELLANT, CHARISE L. LOGAN 1) DID THE LOWER COURTS FAIL TO HONOR THE APPELLANTS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT, BY GIVING A PROPER REVIEW OF HER COMPLAINT INCLUDING OVER 600 (543?) EXHIBITS AND THEREFORE, FAILED TO DETECT NUMEROUS FEDERAL JURISDICTIONAL LAW VIOLATIONS? 2) GRANTED, THE RANGE AND VARIATION OF ANY SINGLE OPINION, OF WHAT “GOOD FAITH,” IS TO ONE INDIVIDUAL, MAY NOT BE “GOOD FAITH,” TO ANOTHER. GRANTED, IN THIS CURRENT TIME, WHAT’S “FRIVOLOUS” TO ONE INDIVIDUAL, MAY NOT BE “FRIVOLOUS” TO ANOTHER. GRANTED, WHAT WAS CONSIDERED “FRIVOLOUS IN 1915,” WHEN THAT LAW WAS CREATED... HAS BEEN OVERCOME WITH RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND COLOREDS TO VOTE, CIVIL RIGHTS: REMOVING SEGRATED DRINKING FOUNTAINS, BATHROOMS, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BUSES, PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND AFTER 80 YEARS OF THE “FRIVOLOUS” CRIES OF PRISONERS, PRISON REFORM IN 1995... DID THE LOWER COURTS DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY SEEK TO ASSIST THE DEFENDANTS, ESPECIALLY, THE CIA AND THE HONORABLE BUSH FAMILY IN A CONSPIRACY, TO COVER UP THE TRUTH CONCERNING THE APPELLANT'S COMPLAINT, AND MISAPPROPRIATELY APPLYIED THE 1915 “FRIVOLOUS,” LAW, BECAUSE THE COURTS DIDN’T WANT TO JUDGE, NOR ORDER RESTITUTION AND AN APOLOGY CONCERNING A MASSIVE COVER UP, WITH A MULTITUDE OF ILLEGAL VIOLATIONS, BESIDES THE EMBARASSMENT OF THE ATTEMPT TO DO SO? 3) GIVEN THE STATEMENT BY THE APPELLANT, CHARISE L. LOGAN WITHIN HER COMPLAINT SUBMITTED AT THE LOWER COURTS, THERE ISN’T ANY AUTHORIZATION BY THE PLAINTIFF FOR THE ALLEDGED “UNAUTHORIZED TESTING.” NOR WAS THE APPELLANT INFORMED OF ANY TESTING. IF, THE C.].A. OPPERATED WITHIN ANY CONTRACT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TO PERFORM TESTING AFTER APPROVAL BY THE D.N.1. AND ATTORNEY GENERAL PROCESS... (WHICH WILL BE PETITIONED IN DISCOVERY) A) DID THE OBSERVING C.I.A. PHYSICIANS AND PSYCHOLOGISTS ASSIGNED TO MONITOR ANY APPROVED TEST OR COUNTER-TESTING FAIL BY THE OPINION OF COLLEGGEES, COWORKERS AND/OR THE GENERAL PUBLIC CEASE ZEROING IN UPON CHARISE L. LOGAN, FAIL TO CEASE MENTAL AND PHYSICAL TORMENTING UPON APPELLANT INCLUDING DEMORALIZATION AND DEFAMATION OF HER CHARACTER, ESPECIALLY WITHIN WALMART? B) DID THE C.I.A. FAIL TO CARRY OUT U.S. COMMUNITY DIRECTIVE 191? aa