Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the -. , First, fifth, sixth, eight,and fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, By the trial court's exclusion of the bases for expert opinion regarding appellant Mental State was it prejudicial and violated Evidence Code 801 & 802, and deprived appellant of his right to due process and ameaning opportunity to present a defense and ; a fair Trial, does this wrongful court's exclusion of the bases of the expert opinion prejudice petitioner given the distorting . effect of the rulling? (2) , Was petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth » and fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, by The trial court Committed reversible error in denying the defense its request for the two Jury instruction (By) and Involuntary 3425 & 3427 the Unconsciousness defense Cal P.C 26-4, and deprived appellant of his right to due process and a meaning opportunity to present his defense; Fair Trial, does the trial court wrongfully denied the defense the Unconsciousness defense " Legally Unconsciousness" did prejudice petitioner and appellant Ranteesi given the Distorting effect of the Rulling? II : . 7 (3) Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the : First, fourth, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth , and fifteenth : , amendment to the United States Constitution, By the Fraud committed by the Paxil Manufacturer Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) did caused. : Vacaville police Failure to read the Miranda Right, Because the Vacaville Police were incompetent to determined that Ranteesi the Petitioner And the Appeallant was Intoxicated from Paxil drugs, and Ranteesi was the victim of Medical Malpractice because of Paxjl1 Does this Vacaville Police incompetent to determined that Ranteesi was intoxicated from Paxil prejudice Petitioner Given the distorting effect of the rulling? (4) Was petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, Fourt, fifth, sixth, eight , fourteenth, and fifteenth : amdndment to the United States Constitution, By the Fraud Committed . by the Paxil Manufacturer (Glaxo Smith Kline) (GSK) did caused : Vacaville Police and Solano County Prosecution team to becam incompetent to prosecute Ranteesj instead they should prosecute the Negligent Party who get "Ranteesi" Intoxicated without his Fault. Also they intentionally or negligently withheld evidence favorable to Ranteesi, does this Incompetent on Vacaville Police Investigator . and Solano County Prosecution team did prejudice Petitioner and "appellant Ranteesi given the distorting effect of the Rulling? Til z (5) . Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fourth , fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, By the fact of this case is that the fraud committed by the Paxil Manufacturer Glaxo Smith kline (GSK) did caused the experts witnesses at Ranteesi's jury trial to became deceitful, Fraudulent, and they Misrepresenting the facts, and Negligently or intentionally withheld evidence of the side effects of the antidepressant Paxil Medication, and the expert witnesses fraudulently misdiognosed Ranteesi's mental illness does this fraudulent, deceitful, and misrepresenting of the facts by the expert witnesses prejudice petitioner and appellant Ranteesi given the distorting effect of the rulling? (6) Was Petitioner denied his Human and Civil Rights Under the First, fourth, fifth, sixth, eight, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, By fact of this case is that thefraud committed by the Paxil Manufacturer Glaxo Smith Kilne (GSK) did caused the trial counsel to become ineffective and incompetent to defend Ranteesi who is intoxicated without his fault from the antidepressant Paxil, “trial counsel performance fell bellow the standareds of effective counsel because of the fraud ; committed by the Paxil Manufacturer (G