No. 20-5687
John Oliver Bryant v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure district-court due-process judicial-procedure jurisdiction legal-review petition-dismissal standing suspension-clause timeliness
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
ERISA DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petition as untimely
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a)) 1. Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petition as untimely. 2. Whether dismissal of the petition violated the Suspension Clause.
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 14, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent