Does the United States Government retain the inherent right to bind this Petitioner and other Defendants to a guilty plea contract it drafted containing an indictment that does not represent the Petitioner or Subject Matter purported to be the offense against the laws of the United States

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does the United States Government retain the inherent right to bind this Petitioner and other Defendants to a guilty plea contract it drafted containing an indictment that does not represent the Petitioner or Subject Matter purported to be the offense against the laws of the United States. 2. Do District. Courts retain jurisdictional authority to convict a defendant when the plea agreement contract implicates a non-existent indictment. 3. Can District: Court acceptance’ of a plea agreement contract with an indictment that fails to represent the Subject and Subject Matter violate the United States Constitution. . . ‘ i 7 } CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned certifies that the following listed persons and entities as described in the fourth sentence of Rule 28.2.1 that have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations . are made in order that the Judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. : , Donald F. Samuel, Defendant's Trial Counsel . Katherine Monahan, Prosecutor, US Assistant Attorney Richard W. Story, District Court Judge ; Mr. Baverman, Magistrate Court Judge Julie E. Carnes, District Court Judge i sonde ore Se : aii i . . . a PETITION FOR AN EXTRAORDINARY WRIT AUTHORIZED BY 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) TABLE _OF CONTENTS PAGE QUESTIONS PRESENTED.2200ees