No. 20-5691

In Re Freeman Berry

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea indictment jurisdiction jurisdictional-authority plea-agreement
Latest Conference: 2020-10-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

the inherent right to bind this Petitioner and other Defendants to a guilty plea contract it drafted. Does the United States Government retain containing an indictment that does not represent the Petitioner or Subject the offense against the laws of the United States. Matter purported to be

2. Do District Courts retain jurisdictional authority to convict a defendant when the plea agreement contract implicates a non-existent indictment.

3. Can District Court acceptance of a plea agreement contract with an indictment that fails to represent the Subject and Subject Matter violate the United States Constitution.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the United States Government retain the inherent right to bind this Petitioner and other Defendants to a guilty plea contract it drafted containing an indictment that does not represent the Petitioner or Subject Matter purported to be the offense against the laws of the United States

Docket Entries

2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-05-01
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

In Re Freeman Berry
Freeman Berry — Petitioner