Whether the Florida state courts erred in rejecting the petitioner's claims of due-process, civil-rights, standing, civil-procedure, takings, 35-usc-101

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a ty ng LB Be fury Wot Lone. able uct if ba, fusidn til where Lhe Lower hibun(QA Kh Flrika. bloke bugre Curf ovret kn | in Lhe foam of, Counks Nur Opal lich aphid a Court, Masur Opinaion.? . , laa mot maLkiral Lufl,, toy, shaban ile iy 7 : (A he Flride. dL te Curt corel or pected nd Grathorged wv ere fororetet 1 . a ag peel aig di tae td me | eg? ond oth, Lala wilroente whngly. _ Hi oat why De dale reinacted Ueakimory of doo dibegny Lillie fis Ei bp. bE a SP Heal Wel lms be pore, sign hall fo | oh K Flake Ltt Agree Gut corel ti sep : t Llru! x maar wLlowig oh case, Lr wwe _ (Dh & Flea Slale Figoeme (ant comes tn | CS focng end (3) L. Lhe Florida. blLe Supreme Cool i a sipig bach postal whos Bt toc haboal. a 2. . owed belix invenbigahar fe liral worde gf JLiliny NO Wiad Lit on Galea bid mot url A wth Bem? Exon of Gi Ki refecanfh AP OO Mew so owreg fo Lfaewine | AM Fleck, Lal Aeprame Court cornut im nogig 0 CML TED ELE Th “tity Helin Wed Cp fee. a