Whether the ordinary forfeiture rule, as codified in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, applies to the limitations period of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a)

QUESTION PRESENTED | | (a), Would the ordinary Forfeiture rule, as codeSied in the . Civil Rules; apply to the limitations period of THe 28 uSt. BPPAUCAIC ? i): Questions Fairly treludeld Therein? A). Waldo § 22 M41) timeliness issue. raised ‘by an appleant on Stale habeas corpus bok had been ceSsed : tebe alleged , or Was “intelligently waived, “ by the State Court, be forSeted on federal habeas corpus ’ | B). ould a. Federal Dishich Court lack subjectmatter Gurisdiction , hile Keeping uth the governing cules . ok Civil Procedure. y to take Gldicial or authoratalive, Notice of a Habeas Rule S cb) reply by the. Slale mais— ing the forfeited imitations defense Sar the first Hime, and , awhen afforted the opportunity, i+ did net develop below 2 , Cc). Then, Would a Federal Court without sub yech-maHer gurisdicton, abuse its discretion by issuing an order deny ing a federal habeas Petition, in party AS dime barred based on a Porfeited’ limilation s defense, eind would thal erdebe void 2%