Whether strict application of procedural deadlines by an Arbitrator under the guidelines of the Consent Order in Pigford v. Glickman resulted in a fundamental miscarriage of justice

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether strict application of procedural deadlines by an Arbitrator under the guidelines of the Consent Order in Pigford v. Glickman, 185 F.R.D. 82 (D.D.C. 1999) to an obviously incompetent Claimant resulted in a fundamental miscarriage of justice and required an exercise of the district court’s equitable jurisdiction where no provision was made in the Consent Order authorizing an arbitrator to appoint a guardian ad litem or allowing an enforcement action to the District Court prior to a final arbitration award? i