Why did a defendant's due process and equal protection rights be violated by the lower court's failure to address a defendant's sentencing error that was apparent on the face of the record, especially when such error resulted in a drastically longer sentence than what should have been required absent such error?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : @ Why eace a Ueendank AS danved due process ank EQual erokeckion Oo luo by He Lower tevlounad’s Parluere: -o addeessS a ekKendank's Scocesheek ettor Yack War apparent on he Gace of Ane Tecocdk, Especrally , when such ercor rag Cesuthed in a deReadest Securny ® Senkbenee much g Canker Khan Me Sc nhence Muse Wowth Wave heen Pequrved ebsenk Such eeron, . . MES cactlage of Sushce. aonk a Manckst Ladustice, ie nor Cotcecked.