When reviewing a suppression ruling on appeal, should the appellate court view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party or review factual findings for clear error and the ultimate legal determination de novo?

QUESTION PRESENTED I. When reviewing a suppression ruling on appeal, should the appellate court view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party (as the Tenth Circuit did below and as five other Circuits do), or (consistent with the other six Circuits) should it not employ a standard and simply review factual findings for clear error and the ultimate legal determination de novo? i