No. 20-5707

Ruth Ellen Reeves v. Mark T. Esper, Secretary of Defense, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection fair-trial institutional-abuse medical-ethics military-intervention patient-rights standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2020-12-11 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it legal for a court to render judgment on a case before the case is heard from the Plaintiff and/or the Defendants?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : CONSTITUTIONALLY RELEVANT QUESTIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 1. Is it legal for a court to render judgment on a case before the case is heard from the Plaintiff and/or the Defendants? 2. Is it legal for a medical institution to violate CMS regulations and refuse to answer a patient's grievance? 3. Is it legal for a court to cause unnecessary delays and obstruct justice? 4. Is it a violation of human rights to administer 460 Volts of electricity to a patient's brain (ECT) against their will? , 5. Is it legal to Baker Act someone for going to a hospital to save his/her life? 6. Is it legal to force a person to take dangerous psychiatric drugs? 7. Is it legal for a CMS regulated medical facility to falsify hospital records to hide treatment that has been forced on a patient? 8. Is it legal to force person to be your patient, against their will, knowing an extreme violation of ethics exists? 9. Is it legal for a doctor or military institution to forcibly remove a civilian from all possibility of ever obtaining the Degree he/she has worked so hard to obtain? 4 of 30 4 MORE CONSTITUTIONALLY RELEVANT QUESTIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 10. Is it legal for a military institution to follow and harass an individual across several state lines in an effort to generate a psychological condition that does not exist in that person? ; 11. Is it legal for a military institution to interfere in an automobile accident | insurance claim of any civilian individual and not provide an explanation to that person? 12. Is it legal for a military institution to intervene in the actions of a lawyer that is currently representing a civilian in an automobile accident that occurred off base? 13. Is it legal for a military institution to have a civilian individual pulled off the highway while traveling out of state, and have that person held there without cause for several hours? 14. Is it legal for a military installation to offer an Army soldier an early release from the Army, in exchange for having her parent permanently institutionalized? 5 of 30 STILL MORE CONSTITUTIONALLY RELEVANT QUESTIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 15. Is it legal for a military installation to hide pertinent medical facts from a former patient regarding internal organ damage obviously caused from poison? 16. Is it legal for a military installation to turn away law enforcement investigation of attempted murder, when there is evidence that poison was a \ factor in the illness of the patient? 17. Is it legal for a military maneuver to take place in which the 18-wheeler driven by an Army Ranger purposely runs off the road to impair the victim's ability to drive in heavy traffic? 18. Is it legal for a military installation to set up an ambush for an innocent and stable civilian upon arrival (with soldiers and ambulances), in order to fulfill their ambition of having him/her permanently institutionalized? 19. Is it legal for military personne! to enter the private residence of a civilian living off base to harass and make his/her life feel threatened? 20. Is it legal for a military institution to purposely give false diagnosis to civilian institutions that are to perform a medical procedure on a civilian? 6 of 30 y | CONCLUSION OF CONSTITUTIONALLY RELEVANT QUESTIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 21. Is it legal for a military institution to refuse to provide a patient of his/her right to a diagnosis as to what almost killed him/her? 22. Is it legal for a CMS medical facility to institutionalize a person, due to religious beliefs? 7 of 30 ia LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2020-12-14
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-11-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
2020-10-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent Esper, Mark T., et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2020)

Attorneys

Esper, Mark T., et al.
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Ruth Ellen Reeves
Ruth Ellen Reeves — Petitioner
Ruth Ellen Reeves — Petitioner