No. 20-5725
Rheashad Lamar Lott v. E. Oseguera, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-conviction due-process federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure post-conviction-relief standing state-supreme-court statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was PeTL {tower's 42 U.S.C. 31493 COMPLATY ENTITLED To REVEFIT OF EQUITARE Tota
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \. Was PeTL {tower's 42 U.S.C. 31493 COMPLATY ENTITLED To REVEFIT OF EQUITARE Tota 7 ; : . 2. Did PET TTtoMeR WHEAT PURWE HTS OB Lam HE PRevewtoy TIN SOME EXTA ORDWAY Wat ROA ASSERT Ih HIs REGIS BetORE THE SAMUTE OF CAMit AVLons EXPIRED? , 3. WAS HE’ FORTH CoecuTt cover OF APPEALS’ DENTAL O¢ PETTTEoWER'S AprzR A Necisxon Le Louruccr Wate OER Commas OF APPEALS OFTHE WT HES OD UNTIED SMES SuRMEME Came! DELTOIons 2
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Rheashad Lott
Rheashad Lamar Lott — Petitioner