No. 20-5737
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process juror-misconduct jury-impartiality jury-selection religious-bias sex-trafficking sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
FourthAmendment Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the presence of a juror with religious bias violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, at petitioner’s trial for sex trafficking—in which the government’s case rested on evidence of the defendant’s conduct as a procurer of prostitution—the presence of a juror who stated that his religion mandates punishment by death for anyone engaged in prostitution activity reflected impermissible bias in violation of the petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury? i INTERESTED PARTIES The are no parties interested in the proceeding other than those named in the caption of the appellate decision. ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent