No. 20-5751
Pedro Fernandez-de Campa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: case-law certiorari-petition criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process judicial-reconsideration precedent precedent-review sentencing stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Al/mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), should be overruled
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Al/mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), should be overruled. i PROCEEDINGS IN FEDERAL TRIAL AND APPELLATE COURTS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS CASE United States District Court (M.D. Fla.): United States v. Pedro Fernandez-de Campa, No. 3:19-cr-38-J-34JBT (July 1, 2019) United States Court of Appeals (11th Cir.): United States v. Pedro Fernandez-de Campa, No. 19-12673 (April 16, 2020) ii
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Pedro Fernandez-de Campa
Lynn Palmer Bailey — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Lynn Palmer Bailey — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent