No. 20-5759
Charles C. Williamson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: accomplice-liability criminal-procedure drug-quantity drug-weight judicial-interpretation relevant-conduct sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court and circuit court misinterpreted and misapplied the 'relevant conduct' provisions of United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 1B1.3 by attributing to the appellant the weight of drugs consumed by the personal use of his accomplice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT AND CIRCUIT COURT MISINTERPRETED AND MISAPPLIED THE “RELEVANT CONDUCT” PROVISIONS OF UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, GUIDELINES MANUAL (U.S.58.G.) § 1B1.3 BY ATTRIBUTING TO THE APPELLANT THE WEIGHT OF DRUGS CONSUMED BY THE PERSONAL USE OF HIS ACCOMPLICE? ii LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 19, 2020)
Attorneys
Charles Williamson
David W Frame — The Law Office of David Frame, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent