No. 20-5764

Rodney Berryman, Sr. v. Robert K. Wong, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-09-23
Status: Granted
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: counsel-representation dna-evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel interlocutory-appeal judicial-error motion-denial new-trial ninth-circuit prejudice pro-se pro-se-motion
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Ninth Circuit err in finding no basis for interlocutory appeal and refusing to allow the petitioner to show district court prejudice

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. Did the Ninth Circuit error by finding no basis for Interlocutory Appeal, (at 9th Cir. No. 02-80106) And after judgment refusing to allow petitioner to show the District Court prejudiced petitioner. 2. Did the Ninth Circuit error when declines to entertain pro se motion, at DktEntry. 121...,"Because you are represented by counsel,” at ‘ DktEntry. 121-2. 3. Did the Ninth Circuit error by declining to entertain two pro se motions, because appellant represented by counsel, when one of the motions shows counsel admitted guilt over petitioner's objection, at DKktEntry. 330 and 329..., Request For Touch-DNA on Brooks Shoe. 4, Did the Ninth Circuit error by not issuing a Order for pro se motion requesting new trial, due to counsel admitted guilt over petitioner's : repeated objection, at DktEntry. 348. 5. Did the Ninth Circuit error in their Opinion on March 27,2020, °-. . ; when knowing before filed Cpening Brief petitioner repeatedly objected to present counsel admitting guilt. See Opinion, At DktEntry. 349. i

Docket Entries

2021-04-26
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-31
Reply of petitioner Rodney Berryman, Sr. filed.
2020-12-30
Petitioner's request to delay distribution of the petition granted. The petition will be distributed on January 21, 2021.
2020-12-23
Brief of respondent Robert Wong in opposition filed.
2020-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 23, 2020.
2020-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2020 to December 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-21
Request from petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari received by the Clerk.
2020-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 23, 2020 to November 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2020.
2020-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 23, 2020)

Attorneys

Robert Wong
Brian R. MeansDepartment of Justice, Off. of, Respondent
Brian R. MeansDepartment of Justice, Off. of, Respondent
Rodney Berryman, Sr.
Rodney Berryman Sr. — Petitioner
Rodney Berryman Sr. — Petitioner