Whether the Court of Appeals and the District Court erred in dismissing the Petitioner's claims and case, including the Petitioner's request for declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, when the records show that the Respondents/Defendants deliberately violated the Petitioner's U.S. and State Constitutional protected rights

No question identified. : ) __ | NCAA Lé. Star dona Provi ti Ong Or L265 USC £14 te hig all 2 cweush Couck andloe Disteich 2orccd : | Q ALN IA Sy tn AGA AA ALC OU 0 reco 16 Clea Hnak the ind. widuel( Such as ty Sed 2, llWheblerr The Courl of Appeals and the Disbriot lA smisting Wu Claims cond Case. Cincluding induatre Leek sealer 18-10 52.64 2uhank.242 the IIe nam nal Counter pais pl 42 WS b Ga3 ob TE Sct ob , | Nig & 1463 Complain lowm'sy Hi gt My Sree OCS | Ea CitkSw the bette btature. of |, nytetseu Win tolel_aonblick with this Honascable LUC. Supeome _ Conch halding in te. Cape ef Wallace-vketo, 1544 WS 384 (2007) when the vecmed 15 tbeae Net commen ray Lalice acreck Of O64. 1B 20\e I WV2h dune $2 Lu axe Cicc On a& provakiou. acyes 4} : du JasCauk dk d ik Ad ot ey col Quad 2 de Qn Hye aid ok Comb, tb Contewd thak + wos booked Bp lin The Neustor V Cousot i) On the. proak av _ llneuacakeon on I=) = 1p amd wae pydloatsen _ eat Cee cabed OY OM Al Zt Ma 6252); Se a Georgia ‘ ntea-thnas USCSMRR SEV PONCE a 2 wear ON the perhabvon reve ake all; . Couyvect: an 2W410-\A-le eC OU Ost 0 led oh,— SY. wr Lou nem Zt, AWA Na, CK CLS 2 to 2. _ l Wet hI CONN net Lok MLZ ChB LL ES vA ee ar a TA Ln On pe # 2habion_revecatiby eurti | Nove Z2O12 ! al Caused: by toe. hecpatlauls ( Dettncentss Lagecilees. ANG +p Yh inchgent CH Amik thie a ube OCF LAE ll Aaa Cengress nite § (G0 4-2 02. 1a thts Mh: | Gndihtbipc te Bit toby Suwhbectire. del-kepafe lage Fa lah ie Bot Ls, lr renlead Mock {foeyecasrd vl fhe Mechel | | . | . lz. Sai lhat I bbehed ti VMeipl 8 coy L] | TE IE the yy: FO pe. VON of” OSU L4 a ; , 13, Thal the tolirtlowte,/ fh nelated ng aS constebiddardl rigfbes Iba _ ly, theknce tbe 1th die andthe, Dichetuk Conn ll Dusmcccel DE mg tase tne spel Loe He | Ca { me 42 became over Wwre\wned ith Jeph of owed Plone Lees of atbisms the. Coucds — i CPAIPMur46/t Dey Mi £SE 4 nib DCS Abia. held 1 tebe nat“ ifr denit hase eae ; des pax | et Eley a [he Diduct cot xeced thaw tet on ll 20 Bcden Sous do} ewe on Cerk 7 = | LE, Pim thi iS Capt one Cake predudve. foward S : ll me ‘hen the records Fram Ye. Diskeizd Court OMNOTNCA v ase 1 tOd do ais Ome” b 62_O Wt, : | ganne. ladigemt étade: Lehomen} +2 proceed. LEP pn GIR. L gee ExhbdC ” Abpeched Lom the records of | rose io ! | | : ( I! And |! Webel ne Covel of A \ | il the Ditewet Couct decisions in His Czée fetal _‘ldisecns Hoe Public, Haak bth 2 these LS. Z tf design del becakely violate tadviduals’ (such ac Miggel€ ) U,S._cad Stake Constitubonal frokched fights [Heder Cacipnal lax and Stees all’ Leon bacd with Cangre-es tandems LH provide | / VHOUS hd = lander 42. USC §/983,when te records oF | | Phe. Dsbeiok Cord. ana [Meg AAAS he B ( Append ‘6’ three. ba tt10 Cleleacl, shows thatYhe. Magictrabe | atknousledge d that if S. tons tukenal sHkS. > Krcboble Aauge yd 2 COEENCTOVLE pre | ‘glihedOy _¢1 hesporttowts /betondonts here | 7 KG on, LZ ee Ae CMMnes. | Yo my Clams toy sebet Cnluncpiens) sender Weuce ge 2) and 242 the Duchick Coat | baled to Qddpeass. and wes povec yeityoned | La, of o } a | _ ! _ SS I II >>—>>—> ee