Should the Maryland Court of Appeals have granted Petitioner's request for a hearing on her Petition for Writ of Mandamus

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW , Should the Maryland Court of Appeals, acting by and through its Attorney Grievance Commission, have granted Petitioner’s request for a hearing on her Petition for Writ of Mandamus, to present her constitutional due process and equal protection challenges, including: (1) the complainant in this attorney disciplinary case admitted that he had no evidence to support his allegations; (2) confidential information of the investigation was improperly disclosed to an unrelated pro bono client; allowing that client to file a complaint; (3) the assigned trial judge for the disciplinary case, Baltimore City Circuit Court Judge, the Honorable Jeffery M. Geller, had been : the trial Judge for another unrelated pro bono client of this ; ‘ Petitioner and (4) permitted the participation of Baltimore City / Circuit Court Judge, the Honorable Lawrence V. Fletcher-Hill, who is currently presiding and ruling in another unrelated pro bono client of this Petitioner? PARTIES ‘ Mitzi Elaine Dailey, Esq. »;~ ~~... Petitioner Maryland Court of Appeals -Respondent Attorney Grievance Commission -Respondent The Honorable Jeffrey M. Geller : Circuit Court of Maryland for Baltimore City -Respondent The Honorable Lawrence V. Fletcher-Hill Circuit Court of Maryland for Baltimore. City -Respondent Lydia E. Lawless, Esq. -Respondent : Christine Marie Celeste, Esq. Respondent Brian E. Frosh, Maryland Attorney General Michele McDonald, Assistant Attorney General Joseph Dudek, Assist Attorney General ; Debora Goodrick, Assistant Attorney General -Counsel for All Respondent(s) , li