No. 20-5831

Rafael Cezar Danam v. Arizona Board of Education

Lower Court: Arizona
Docketed: 2020-09-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-hearing bill-of-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment freedom-of-speech redress-of-grievances stare-decisis
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the inferior, subordinate courts' rulings and orders superior to the Supreme Court of the United States?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question I From the founding of the United States of America, the “inalienable” right of “Freedom : of Speech” and the right of “Redress of Grievances” has been the foundational pillar of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, where during the tumultuous plight of America’s founding, First President and Commander-in-Chief George Washington proclaimed: If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.! The “Stare Decisis” of the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled numerous times on the importance and vitality of “Freedom of Speech” and “Redress of Grievances” as a fundamental right of all-American citizens. The rulings and orders from the Appeals Court of Arizona, Superior Court of Arizona-Office of Judicial Hearings of Administrative Decisions and the Arizona Board of Education Administrative Hearing have violated a fundamental right that : “Stare Decisis” affirms by authority as “Law of the Land” by the Supreme Court of the United States. Is the inferior, subordinate courts rulings and orders superior to the Supreme Court of the United States? As the great wisdom of the Bard proclaimed, “To be, or not to be? That is the question.” . Question I The United States Bill of Rights are the monumental pillars on which the full scope of the U.S. Constitution is founded upon. Numerous Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States have specifically highlighted the paramount importance of the U.S. Bill of Rights. “For the Bill . of Rights is the guardian of our society as well as our liberty.”>The Arizona Board of Education as both a State and Federal representative of education as authorized by both the U.S. Constitution and State of Arizona Constitution have placed themselves above the law and by injustice violated rights of law against Petitioner violating U.S. Amendments I, V, VI, VIII, XIV. By “Stare Decisis” of the Supreme Court of the United States, is the Arizona Board of Education superior to the Supreme Court of the United States? “.. Any state, any entity, any ideology which fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man...that state is obsolete. A case to be filed under “M” for “Mankind”-in the Twilight Zone.”* 1 George Washington, Address to officers of the Army (15 March 1783). : 2 William Shakespeare, “Hamlet” Act Ill, Scene | 3 John F. Kennedy, U.S. President “Response to questionnaire in Saturday Review, October 29, 1960” 4 Rod Serling, “Twilight Zone: ‘The Obsolete Man’” Episode 65, Season 2, June 2, 1961. oo ee

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-22
Waiver of right of respondent Arizona Board of Education et al. to respond filed.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Arizona Board of Education et al.
Kim S AndersonOffice of the Arizona Attorney General/Education and Health Section, Respondent
Kim S AndersonOffice of the Arizona Attorney General/Education and Health Section, Respondent
Rafael Cezar Danam
Rafael Cezar Danam — Petitioner
Rafael Cezar Danam — Petitioner