No. 20-5837

In Re Edward Donald Oberwise

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2020-09-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2244 actual-innocence aedpa aedpa-standards circuit-court habeas-corpus state-court successive-petition teague teague-claim
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court should grant a writ of habeas corpus to a non-capital state court defendant who has no other available forum to raise a compelling claim of actual innocence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED fn Should ths Court use rts power do grant a weit of habeas cor pus to @ nen capital state court defendant who has no other available forum de raise a compelling claim of actual innocence * , i 2. Whether the Circust Court of Appeals implicit rejection for leet the District Court for adjudication of actual snnocence claims was contrary do the interpretation of 28 U.S.C. 2 2244 (LQBXii)? 3. Whether the sdecte courts’ denial of new Claims as untinely Is contary to ; the AEOFA Standards setforth sa Me @uigg inv. Rerkins, 133 S.e4, 1924 (2013)? 4, Whether a Teague claim filed offer a Rtthoner’s initial habeas proceeding Was previously unavailable for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 7 224 -b)QXA) feage ‘ Se TABLE. OF CONTENTS Question fresented » . , 2, toe ee

Docket Entries

2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-16
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Edward D. Oberwise
Edward Oberwise — Petitioner
Edward Oberwise — Petitioner