No. 20-5839

Henry McCall v. Homer Hillis

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2020-09-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure due-process federal-courts standing statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-11-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the lower courts err in concluding that the petitioner's claims were barred by the statute of limitations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did Re 216" OLAait Coutts Cllengin Conch, tapas Crack o> donk Cavite Sunale, 2017 Matin fon NesTOris, } Kitiched! Steped Filed Same tz, 2017 Méten fr Newtrla 2 ach Dideichl Court Case Vo. IWdi'T Case Sumraney for Stomarnainy TS wagomect * | ee a IN THE — : SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: ‘ The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at

Docket Entries

2020-11-23
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent Homer Hills to respond filed.
2020-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 29, 2020)

Attorneys

Henry McCall
Henry McCall — Petitioner
Homer Hills
William David FarmerCurney, Farmer, House, Osuna & Jackson, P.C., Respondent