No. 20-5849

Uzoma Igbonwa v. Facebook, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-10-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights conflict-of-interest due-process facebook free-speech immunity-provision ninth-circuit section-230 terms-of-service
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Facebook was should be protected by the immunity provision of Section 230 of the Communication and Decency Act when they clearly violated its own terms of service

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Facebook was should be protected by the immunity provision of Section 230 of the Communication and Decency Act when they clearly violated its own terms of service. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Deprived the Petitioner of his Due Process Right to be heard when they stated that Petitioner did not have facts supporting his argument of breach of conflict while the facts were clearly stated in the brief. 3. Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in this case directly conflicted with its own ruling on the same argument in a different case that came before them.

Docket Entries

2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2020)

Attorneys

Uzoma Igbonwa
Uzoma Igbonwa — Petitioner
Uzoma Igbonwa — Petitioner