No. 20-5857
Alimamy Barrie v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-USC-3582 criminal-procedure discretion federal-sentencing guidelines judicial-discretion retroactivity sentencing sentencing-amendment statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a post-sentencing clarifying guideline amendment is applicable to a defendant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) Whether Pursuant to_1% U:$.68 3 6640)G ) a Reshtution, Order Should be Modify when Ciraumstaaces relating to the Case has Chonsed 4 2) Whebher a Fost Seateacing Clarifuing auideline amendneat 1S aeplicable to_a_defendont Fursuant 40 WW US.c & 358ZOWD even Anough the Amendment is NOt lished WW U-S-S& § 1B1-10@) Os jhir Coud had Issued in Dillion ve US, 560 US BIF. $21,130 S.Ct 2683 Zoid) but did not addcess Hre_agplteation of Clacifsas, ameadmeats and lower Couas are ayaatios, _ Dock Usttons ease on disceetioa and aot the Laws? ee
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2020)
Attorneys
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent