No. 20-5862
Markey Antonio Goldston v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal-waiver appellate-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process government-overreach plea-agreement plea-bargaining
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a defendant's right to due process of law violated when the government requires an appeal waiver as part of a plea agreement?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. IS A DEFEDANT’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW VIOLATED WHEN THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES AN APPEAL WAIVER AS PART OF A PLEA AGREEMENT? ii
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-09-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Markey Antonio Goldston
John David Bryson — Wyatt Early Harris Wheeler LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent