Whether the district court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of appellate jurisdiction

No question identified. : oe Sin Ore Seaked ee Did AME canes aluse WS. a. Seo lo dering A. a eC icote. of appealability 0 Ine Ahece 15 a Conficke in wo Ie DSO ComcdS of Ahe ee -——iSSme and ~gucists. of ee Ne aSoa MSancee re a ae ee AU achieS appeac im the o_o a Capen. of Ahe cose ea oo. wee he Cover Page. 2 2 a nevex Dix _(B)_ vise. Const TON. 2 Tale ot PxWnories cited an OSS Page NO oe ted Shakes: Vicantn No ves | _ R= WSR AN DOA WE 2448913 (SO Te ——.Anne ATA) a page AS oo . acded Stakes V mannan 2020 Neance ; _ _ —___ _\40cS 23397 D wirah toto _. page 5 _ wo SH ANES rnd @uleS : _ _ 7 __ 8982 (CA SNS ox 9 2 Su gceame Cony of Ae 2 ave dd Se okeS RS oy Soe sey of Cerkiocacy 0 8 ee a ReARMones 5 pec OMY PLANS. Vaak_a oo ot of cetkioras\ Xx ceyierd Ake Lo i A QEMERT Welo WL be §SSued ce LOR ADIOS. BelQO oe _ Sedecot— ComcyS a TH! Cpiion of AhE. Urryedk Stokes wo ee EOF Awpears agpeacs ak ~ AR pendix (A) to Ahe peAion and ee AS. unpublished Oe he wemMon. of Ane DI Saeh cer Conte ky peaes ar