No. 20-5866
Shawn Kristi Dicken v. Shawn Brewer, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: brady-material brady-v-maryland constitutional-amendments criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence exculpatory-evidence expert-testimony prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-11-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was petitioner denied discovery pursuant to Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 violating her V, VI and XIV Const. Amends.?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; I. WAS PETITIONER DENIED DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO BRADY v. MARYLAND 373 U.S. 83 VIOLATING HER V, VI AND XIV CONST. AMENDS. ? II. WAS IMPROPER EXPERT OPINION TO LEGAL CONCLUSIONS A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS, VIOLATING PETITIONERS V, VI AND XIV CONST. AMENDS.? III.WAS THE TRIAL COURTS DENIAL OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE A VIOLATION OF PETITIONERS V, VI AND XIV CONST. AMENDS.? IV. DID PROSECUTION COMMIT REVERSIBLE ERROR DURING HIS ARGUMENT ABOUT MS. HARRY'S POWER OF ATTORNEY VIOLATING PETITIONERS V, VI AND XIV CONST. AMENDS.? tj
Docket Entries
2020-11-16
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.
2020-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent Shawn Brewer, Warden to respond filed.
2020-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 2, 2020)
Attorneys
Shawn Brewer, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent