Did the State's admission of the ill-court testimony and OWA report of a Surrogate DWA analyst in lieu of the actual testing DWA analyst and DWA report violate the Petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to Confrontation under the standard of Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Did the State’s admission of the ill-court testimony and | OWA report of a Surrogate DWA analyst in lieu of the actual testing DWA analyst and DWA report. Violate the bet Honer's Sixth Amendment right to Controntation; Under the stan| dotd of Bulleaming 1. Hew Mexico, Sb4 US.131 8.Ct.2705 ? (2) Whether trial counsel violated te Petitioner's Sivth Amendment right to Effective Assistance of Counsel” Hifough cum lative errors, whén counsel! fa‘ led 40 Conduct an. independent pre-wial investigation into +h€ laws, facts, pleadings, and cifcumstances of the Pet fover's COSL? 1