When the inferior District Court failed and/or refused to initiate or commence the action by issuing the summons as required by Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure #3 and #4 then using other rule to eliminate the petitioners claim actions that effectively denies the Appellants' rights to access to the courts, due process, equal protection of the law, and to have an unbiased judge, did that Judge of the inferior Courts, hold his Offices during good Behaviour?

No question identified. : Questions for the Court I. When the inferior District Court failed and/or refused to initiate or commence the action by issuing the summons as required by Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure #3 and #4 then using other rule to eliminate the petitioners claim actions that effectively denies the Appellants’ rights to access to the courts, due process, equal protection of the law, and to have an unbiased judge, did that Judge of the inferior Courts, hold his Offices during good Behaviour? II. Prior to the commencement of an action does the court have jurisdiction to use a court rule, only applicable to an open active action, such as a time bar, to dismiss the action that has not yet commenced? III. Does the right of the people to access to the courts and the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances apply only to those who can pay the court fees up front since the Wyoming Supreme Court has repealed Wyoming Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.07 “In Forma Pauperis [Repealed] Repealed April 6, 2015, effective July 1, 2015” and requires all court fees be paid before cases can be docketed? IV. Did the draftsmen of State and Federal Constitutions established an agreement or contract with the people to govern the people, provided rights were guaranteed to the people protected by dividing the powers of the government into three distinct departments to be a safeguard against the government or any department of the government to be party to deny, impair, or disparage rights due the people; and was such violations of that contract inconceivable, at a creation of these Constitutions, that government officials or entities acting for a state would allow or be party to any such violation? V. What redress is available for the Appellants; when much like in George Floyd’s recent murder, the Appellants had entities acting for the State of Wyoming showing a systemic Page 1 of 2 willingness to break established law and violate the Appellants’ rights with no fear of investigation, arrest, prosecution, or even to be held to accountable by a civil court. These entities being allied with the County Prosecuting Attorney, the District Courts, and the Wyoming Supreme Court were shielded even when this was in contradiction with government officials’ oath or affirmation of office. Even Governors (Mead & Gordon) and their Attorney Generals (Peter K. Michael & Bridget Hill) have refused to investigate reports of misconduct and malfeasance in office and the commission of a crime of a deprival of rights by entities like the sheriff, his deputies, and the district attorney as Wyoming code 1-35-103, 1-35-104, and : 9-1-605 (c) decrees? VI. Should every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs have been committed, conspired to be committed, or, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid = * in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act? Page 2 of 2 Fane R. Sellers #25665 and Steven Babcock #27869 Wyoming Honor Conservation Camp P.O. Box 160 Newcastle, WY 82701 IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT FANE R. SELLERS ) STEVEN BABCOCK ) FOR AND IN BEHALF OF ) ALL INMATES ) ) Appellants (Petitioners), ) ) Vs. ) CASENO.. ) ) W.S.Ct. CASE # 8-20-0109 ) & District Court CASE NO. 188-643 : ) THE STATE OF WYOMING, ) GOVERNOR MATT MEAD ) ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE ) OF WYOMING, PETER K. MICHAEL, AND ) ALL ENTITIES ACTING FOR THE ) STATE OF WYOMING, ) ) Appellees (Respondents). ) . PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI WYOMING SUPREME COURT CASE NO. S-20-0109 AND STATE OF WYOMING FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 188-643 Appellants _ __. COMES NOW; the Appellants: Fane R. Sellers, Steven Babcock, and all inmates within the ~ "custody of the State of Wyoming in the United States or who have been in the custody of the State of Wy