I. When the inferior District Court failed and/or refused to initiate or commence the action by
issuing the summons as required by Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure #3 and #4 then using
other rule to eliminate the petitioners claim actions that effectively denies the Appellants '
rights to access to the courts, due process, equal protection of the law, and to have an unbiased
judge, did that Judge of the inferior Courts, hold his Offices during good Behaviour?

II. Prior to the commencement of an action does the court have jurisdiction to use a court rule,
only applicable to an open active action, such as a time bar, to dismiss the action that has not
yet commenced?

III. Does the right of the people to access to the courts and the right of the people to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances apply only to those who can pay the court fees up
front since the Wyoming Supreme Court has repealed Wyoming Rule of Appellate Procedure
10.07 "In Forma Pauperis [Repealed] Repealed April 6, 2015, effective July 1, 2015 " and
requires all court fees be paid before cases can be docketed?

IV. Did the draftsmen of State and Federal Constitutions established an agreement or contract
with the people to govern the people, provided rights were guaranteed to the people protected
by dividing the powers of the government into three distinct departments to be a safeguard
against the government or any department of the government to be party to deny, impair, or
disparage rights due the people; and was such violations of that contract inconceivable, at
~~ creation of these Constitutions, that government officials or entities acting for a state would
allow or be party to any such violation?

V. What redress is available for the Appellants; when much like in George Floyd 's recent
murder, the Appellants had entities acting for the State of Wyoming showing a systemic
willingness to break established law and violate the Appellants ' rights with no fear of
investigation, arrest, prosecution, or even to be held to accountable by a civil court. These
entities being allied with the County Prosecuting Attorney, the District Courts, and the
Wyoming Supreme Court were shielded even when this was in contradiction with government
officials ' oath or affirmation of office. Even Governors (Mead & Gordon) and their Attorney
Generals (Peter K. Michael & Bridget Hill) have refused to investigate reports of misconduct
and malfeasance in office and the commission of a crime of a deprival of rights by entities like
the sheriff, his deputies, and the district attorney as Wyoming code 1-35-103, 1-35-104, and
9-1-605 (c) decrees?

VI. Should every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs have been committed,
conspired to be committed, or, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid
in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be
committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages
caused by such wrongful act?

When the inferior District Court failed and/or refused to initiate or commence the action by issuing the summons as required by Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure #3 and #4 then using other rule to eliminate the petitioners claim actions that effectively denies the Appellants' rights to access to the courts, due process, equal protection of the law, and to have an unbiased judge, did that Judge of the inferior Courts, hold his Offices during good Behaviour?